IrateNation  

Go Back   IrateNation > All about the USA > Republican Party

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:45 PM
Eagle's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 735
Default McCain: Obama has 'done well' as president so far

McCain: Obama has 'done well' as president so far - Yahoo! News

John, you are either stupid or lying, maybe both JMO
__________________
Irate Nation

"When a government betrays the people by amassing too much power and becoming tyrannical, the people have NO CHOICE but to exercise their original right of self defense- to fight the government"
Alexander Hamilton
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2009, 12:28 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle View Post
McCain: Obama has 'done well' as president so far - Yahoo! News

John, you are either stupid or lying, maybe both JMO
America does not need one more diplomat. McCain is a Politician. This is part of what cost him his chance at the Presidency.

Nay, not a Diplomat but a leader we crave.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 11:00 PM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,860
Default Say goodbye, John

Meghan McCain Blasts Tea Partiers

Senator's daughter says Tea Party movement is 'innate racism,' turning off young people — and rips on Palin

That ought to just about do McCain in. I think that this 'progressive' liberal RINO is just about to be retired. Say goodbye, John.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2010, 11:04 PM
Diogenes's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,044
Default

Sounds to me like McCain is making some tactical maneuvers, CYA style. Bet he pulls a party switch in the next 12 months.(slim chance but I wouldn't be surprised.)

Never had a liking for him, since the first time I heard him speak. Then I remembered his past in AZ and things became clearer.

Still don't like the douche bag.
__________________
The world was here first, it owes you nothing. Count yourself fortunate if you get all you've earned. Count yourself a thief if you get what others have earned. Count yourself a parasite if you believe you're entitled to it.-Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2010, 05:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nys
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
Sounds to me like McCain is making some tactical maneuvers, CYA style. Bet he pulls a party switch in the next 12 months.(slim chance but I wouldn't be surprised.)

Never had a liking for him, since the first time I heard him speak. Then I remembered his past in AZ and things became clearer.

Still don't like the douche bag.
thinking back it's almost like McCain did everything he could to actually lose the election. Palin backfired, his military career back fired, never touched Obama's eligibility with dual citizenship alone nor questioned if Obama was really loyal to the US. There were so many things he could have attacked Obama on. Obama's lack of educational documents, his connection to ACORN, the media's obsession and being called a messiah.

Instead he called him an empty suite. Either McCain is stupid or a patsy.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-10-2010, 06:37 PM
Diogenes's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,044
Default

Quote:
patsy.

Thats how I see it. I would think it would be very hard to prove but I wouldn't be surprised to find he was paid to throw the election.

It was rather close even so. Only a 3% difference in levels of voting. The Ron Paul votes wouldn't have made up the difference either even though he made a strong showing after pulling out of the race.

Now the real question is, Would we be seeing anything different if McCain had won the race?


I kind of doubt it.

I think the handlers are the same no matter who is in power, the only difference being how strong the push is.
__________________
The world was here first, it owes you nothing. Count yourself fortunate if you get all you've earned. Count yourself a thief if you get what others have earned. Count yourself a parasite if you believe you're entitled to it.-Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2010, 03:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nys
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
Thats how I see it. I would think it would be very hard to prove but I wouldn't be surprised to find he was paid to throw the election.

It was rather close even so. Only a 3% difference in levels of voting. The Ron Paul votes wouldn't have made up the difference either even though he made a strong showing after pulling out of the race.

Now the real question is, Would we be seeing anything different if McCain had won the race?


I kind of doubt it.

I think the handlers are the same no matter who is in power, the only difference being how strong the push is.
I'm thinking he was paid to throw the race too. I'm also beginning to wonder if Bush was paid as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Iratenation.com