IrateNation  

Go Back   IrateNation > All about the USA > International News and Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2009, 12:47 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default U.S. Foreign Policy

The American public does NOT have the right to know everything.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2009, 12:50 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default

China Demands U.S. Navy End Surveillance Missions

Even in international waters.
_________________________________________

China demands this even while she drills for oil off the US coast, steals critical classified technology, and owns half of the US treasury bond yields.
_________________________________________
Will Barry back down?
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum

Last edited by Soffitrat; 03-12-2009 at 12:51 AM. Reason: incomplete post
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2009, 01:19 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default Worth repeating

Thanks to the original poster of this article.

Civil Unrest in America?
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2009, 03:12 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default Just supposition... for all you liberal dumba$$es

War in Iraq: Saudi request, American gift, Saudi payback?
______________________________________
After the Soviet military withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Saudis and the Pakistanis continued to cooperate. Even though the world at large refused to accept the Taliban regime after it took power in 1996, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates recognized the Taliban as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan. (These three were the only countries to do so.) However, while enjoying support from Riyadh and Islamabad, the Taliban also established relations with the transnational jihadist forces led by al Qaeda.

The Saudi and Pakistani relationship with the Taliban was shattered by the events of 9/11. In spite of aggressive negotiations with the Taliban, neither the Saudis nor the Pakistanis could convince Mullah Omar to surrender bin Laden and the al Qaeda leadership to the Americans. Because of this, the two countries were forced to end their overt relationship with the Taliban as the Americans invaded Afghanistan, though they obviously have maintained some contact with members of the Taliban leadership.

The U.S. response to 9/11 placed the Saudis and the Pakistanis into a very difficult position, where they were forced to fight jihadists on one hand and try to maintain control and influence over them on the other. As previously discussed, the Saudis possessed the resources to effectively clamp down on the al Qaeda franchise in the kingdom, but Pakistan, which is weaker both financially and politically — and which has become the center of the jihadist universe on the physical battlefield — has been hit much harder by the U.S.-jihadist war.

This situation, along with the ground reality in Afghanistan, has forced the United States to begin working on a political strategy to bring closure to the U.S.-jihadist war that involves negotiating with the Taliban if they part ways with al Qaeda and the transnational jihadists.

Hence the recent visit by Taliban officials to Saudi Arabia and the trips made by Riyadh’s intelligence chief, Prince Muqrin bin Abdel-Aziz, to Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Saudi monarch, King Abdullah, is also rumored to be personally involved behind the scenes in efforts to pressure Taliban leaders to break free from al Qaeda. But as in the past, the Saudis need help from their allies in Islamabad and Rawalpindi, and here is where they are running into problems. A weak and threatened Pakistani state means that before working with the Pakistanis on the Afghan Taliban, Riyadh has to help Pakistan combat its own Taliban problem, which the Saudis currently are attempting. The Saudis obviously have much to offer the Pakistanis, in terms of both cash and experience. They also have the religious cachet that other Pakistan allies, such as the Americans and the British, lack, giving them the ability to broach ideological subjects.

However, as is the case with the Afghan Ta liban, the Saudis will have to get the Pakistani Taliban to part ways with al Qaeda and are working hard to drive a wedge between Pakistani militants and their foreign guests.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:08 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default

China's Premier Worries About U.S. Treasury Holdings

Friday, March 13, 2009


Premier Wen Jiabao noted that that China is now the largest creditor to the United States and as such wants to make sure that U.S. policies dealing with the financial crisis do not damage the value of Chinese holdings.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nys
Posts: 396
Default

the solution to our foreign policy is rather simple.

We open up our own oil reserves--we got more oil than the middle east here in the USA. Put in place better public transportation, and help convert out dependency on oil to hydrogen fuel cars.

Close down half our overseas bases. We have over a 1,000. Let the middle east sort out it's own problems. Stop meddling in everyone elses problems and focus on our own.

repeal NAFTA
Close the CIA-it's too corrupt.

Close the fed, replace the gold standard and take control of our economy from the bankers.

And above all....

educate the american public that America is a republic and never a democracy and make sure they know the difference.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:45 PM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rachelinnys View Post
the solution to our foreign policy is rather simple.

We open up our own oil reserves--we got more oil than the middle east here in the USA. Put in place better public transportation, and help convert out dependency on oil to hydrogen fuel cars.

Close down half our overseas bases. We have over a 1,000. Let the middle east sort out it's own problems. Stop meddling in everyone elses problems and focus on our own.

repeal NAFTA
Close the CIA-it's too corrupt.

Close the fed, replace the gold standard and take control of our economy from the bankers.

And above all....

educate the american public that America is a republic and never a democracy and make sure they know the difference.
I agree with:
educate the american public that America is a republic and never a democracy and make sure they know the difference

Close the fed, replace the gold standard and take control of our economy from the bankers.

Open up our own oil reserves

These won't work:
Let the middle east sort out it's own problems. Stop meddling in everyone elses problems and focus on our own.

repeal NAFTA

Close the CIA-it's too corrupt.
_________________________________
Isolationism is not a feasible option.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:11 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default I just gotta transfer this one.

I just gotta transfer this excellent post to the foreign policy thread. Hope Feedman doesn't mind.
________________________________________
Hillary in the Middle East
In putting formation of a Palestinian state at the top of her priority list, Hillary Clinton is putting her chips, first and foremost, on the PA and only secondarily on Israel's security interests.

More...
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:34 AM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default You tell me.

You tell me why I am posting this under the U.S. Foreign Policy thread. Can you figure it out?
_______________________________________________

According to the latest data from the Renewable Fuels Association, ethanol production is currently averaging 0.60 million barrels per day. At the subsidy of 51¢ per gallon, this amount of ethanol production costs taxpayers over $4 Billion in 2008.


The ethanol future looks much worse. The “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007” required maximum ethanol production of 2.35 million barrels per day by 2022. But, this amount of ethanol production will require the entire corn crop in the US, every kernel of corn.
__________________________________


BTW, I hope that you don't like corn either!
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum

Last edited by Soffitrat; 03-14-2009 at 12:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2009, 03:31 PM
Soffitrat's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: somewhere in East Texas
Posts: 2,851
Default

Iran, China Sign $3.2B Gas Deal
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Iratenation.com